On February 19, a federal magistrate judge in the Southern District of Florida affirmed the CFPB's Final Rule, mandating that merchant cash advances (MCAs) be categorized as "credit" under the ECOA. This decision enforces Section 1071 data collection and reporting requirements on providers.

The court rejected arguments from the Revenue Based Finance Coalition (RBFC) that MCAs are not credit, ruling that MCAs involve deferred payment of debt and fall under ECOA’s broad statutory definition. Immediate implications include:

• MCA providers must now comply with fair lending data reporting requirements starting as early as October 2024.

• The ruling preserves the CFPB’s authority to regulate alternative financing products under ECOA.

• Injunctions from prior litigation (e.g., Texas Bankers) are likely dissolved post-Supreme Court’s 2024 decision upholding the CFPB’s funding structure

The court determined MCAs qualify as "credit" under ECOA’s definition (“the right to defer payment of debt”) for three reasons:

1. Debt Obligation: MCAs create a contractual obligation for businesses to repay advances from future revenue, even if contingent on sales.

2. Deferred Payment: Repayment is deferred until future sales occur, satisfying ECOA’s requirement for payment deferral.

3. Distinction from Factoring: Unlike factoring (purchase of existing receivables), MCAs involve future receivables, aligning them with credit transactions rather than asset purchases.

The court emphasized that contractual labels (e.g., “sale of future receivables”) do not override the economic substance of MCAs as credit.

Citations: 1  Revenue Based Fin. Coal. v. CFPB, S.D. Fla. Case No. 23-24882 (2025) (Report & Recommendation). 2 CFPB Final Rule, 88 Fed. Reg. 35,150 (2023).

Strategic Impact Analysis & Compliance Innovation for Alternative Lenders

The CFPB’s ECOA reclassification of MCAs introduces 3-5% EBITDA compression for mid-sized lenders ($10M–$50M annual revenue), driven by:

• Tech Overhaul Costs: $200K–$500K for automated underwriting systems (e.g., Blend, Ocrolus).

• Legal/Compliance Staffing: $150K/year for dedicated ECOA compliance officers.

• Portfolio Contraction: 15–20% reduction in high-risk micro-business approvals due to fair lending scrutiny.

Example: A $30M-revenue MCA provider serving 1,200 SMBs faces ~$750K in first-year compliance costs, reducing net margins from 18% to 13%.

Case Studies: Successful Regulatory Navigation

1. Onyx IQ’s Disclosure Automation

   • Deployed AI-driven contract analysis tools to auto-generate state-specific disclosures, cutting compliance labor costs by 40%₄.

2. InnReg’s Mobile Lender Client

   • Achieved 90-second underwriting decisions while meeting ECOA requirements via API integrations with Plaid + Socure’s KYC tools₅.

3. QUALCO’s Collections Optimization

   • Reduced default rates by 22% post-regulation using predictive analytics to adjust repayment terms dynamically₆.

Lessons from Other Sectors: Actionable Plays

Key Insight: Regulatory survivors invested early in closed-loop ecosystems (e.g., partnerships with accounting software like QuickBooks) to reduce data collection costs.

Creative Compliance Strategies Beyond Factoring

1. Hybrid Revenue Participation Agreements

   • Structure deals as equity-like revenue shares (e.g., 2% of gross sales for 24 months) with no fixed repayment obligation. Precedent: SaaS-based revenue financing models used by Pipe.

2. Dynamic APR MCAs

   • Algorithmically adjust fees based on real-time merchant sales data via API connections. Example: Fee reductions for merchants hitting revenue thresholds (e.g., 10% discount if sales >$50K/month).

3. Embedded Finance Partnerships

   • White-label MCAs through POS systems (e.g., Square, Toast) to leverage their existing ECOA compliance infrastructure₇.

4. Blockchain-Backed Receivables

   • Tokenize future receivables on private blockchains (e.g., Hyperledger) to frame transactions as asset sales vs. credit.

Why the Ruling Misunderstands MCAs

The court’s “deferred payment” rationale ignores three MCA fundamentals:

1. Risk Transfer: Providers absorb 100% of sales volatility risk—unlike lenders with fixed repayments.

2. Non-Recourse Nature: No personal guarantees or collateral, making defaults a business failure risk vs. credit risk.

3. B2B Context: MCAs serve commercial entities, not consumers, yet are regulated under consumer protection frameworks.

Survival Toolkit for 2025

• Immediate Action: Audit contracts for “deferred payment” language; replace with “revenue-sharing agreement” terminology.

• Mid-Term Play: Partner with RegTechs like Socure for AI-driven UBO verification to preempt CTA compliance costs.

• Long-Term Vision: Develop a “Regulatory Arbitrage Index” identifying states with favorable MCA laws (e.g., Texas, Florida) for geographic prioritization.

1-Minute Video: Get SOS Business Officer Info in Seconds using Secretary of State API

Headlines You Don’t Want to Miss

CFPB Agrees to Drop Case Against SoLo Funds as Agency Cuts Back

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) dropped its lawsuit against SoLo Funds, a peer-to-peer lending platform, on February 13, 2025, marking a significant shift in the agency’s enforcement priorities under the Trump administration. The case, initially filed in May 2024, accused SoLo Funds of using deceptive practices to extract fees from borrowers, including misleading users about “voluntary” tips and donations that effectively functioned as interest on loans with annual percentage rates (APRs) exceeding 1,000%.

BNPL Fintech Affirm Announces Expanded Agreement with Shopify

Affirm and Shopify have significantly expanded their buy now, pay later (BNPL) partnership, extending Shop Pay Installments to Canada and planning a UK rollout. This multi-year agreement solidifies Affirm as the exclusive BNPL provider for Shopify merchants in the U.S. and Canada, while positioning the companies for international growth.

GOP Leader Zeros In On Enviro And Fintech Rules For Repeal

House Republicans are prioritizing the repeal of Biden-era environmental and fintech regulations, including an IRS rule targeting cryptocurrency reporting that is currently facing industry litigation. The effort leverages the Congressional Review Act to roll back recent rules, with GOP leadership focusing on deregulation in sectors like digital assets and clean energy tax credits.