
Fortress Agrees to Buy Up to $1.5 Billion of Wayflyer's Merchant Advances
A fixed-fee, daily-remittance product built for online merchants is now institutional forward-flow collateral. The price of that validation was not disclosed.
What happened. Fortress Investment Group has agreed to purchase as much as $1.5 billion of loans originated by Wayflyer, the Dublin-headquartered revenue-based financing platform for e-commerce businesses, Bloomberg reported July 29. Funds managed by Fortress affiliates will buy the assets over a three-year arrangement intended to underpin the platform's growth.1
Who is selling. Wayflyer, founded in 2019 by Aidan Corbett and Jack Pierse, says it has deployed more than $6 billion to over 7,000 businesses and reached a $1.6 billion valuation in 2022. Its product is a familiar instrument on this desk: advances from $5,000 to $20 million, a fixed fee typically in the 5% to 10% range, repayment as a percentage of daily sales or fixed installments over roughly 3 to 9 months, with funding in 1 to 3 business days.2 6
The pattern. This extends a visible Fortress habit of buying fintech originations at scale: a $2 billion loan platform extension with SoFi announced April 17, 2025, forward-flow agreements with Upstart including $1.25 billion announced this April, and now up to $1.5 billion of SMB revenue-based paper.21 8 9
What is not in the announcement. Purchase pricing, advance rates, loss sharing, and servicing economics are all undisclosed. Wayflyer's own press room carries no release; the deal exists in the record as original Bloomberg reporting, and one syndicated account even carries a different headline figure of $2 billion. The asset class got its validation; the market did not get the terms.1 2
What Alternative Business Lenders Need to Know
What exactly did Fortress agree to buy?
Under the arrangement, funds managed by affiliates of Fortress will purchase loans that Wayflyer originates, up to $1.5 billion over three years.1 That is a forward-flow structure: the originator keeps the customer relationship and the underwriting engine, the buyer takes the assets as they are created, and origination capacity stops being limited by the originator's own balance sheet. Two record-keeping notes matter here. First, Wayflyer has published no press release; its press room's most recent funding item is the February ATLAS SP facility, so the deal's public record is Bloomberg's original reporting rather than company promotion.3 Second, at least one syndicated account describes the same arrangement as a $2 billion purchase, a discrepancy that likely reflects loose aggregation of the new commitment with existing facilities. Bloomberg's "as much as $1.5 billion" is the controlling figure until either party publishes terms.2
What paper is Fortress actually buying?
Functionally, merchant advances. Wayflyer's core product advances $5,000 to $20 million against future sales for a fixed fee, generally 5% to 10% of the advance, collected as a percentage of daily sales or on fixed daily, weekly, or bi-weekly installments across terms that run about 3 to 9 months.6 Underwriting runs on live commerce data: applicants connect Shopify, WooCommerce, Stripe and similar accounts, minimum sustained revenue of roughly $10,000 a month applies, and approved merchants are funded in 1 to 3 business days.7 Any MCA or revenue-based funder will recognize the instrument family; the fee mechanics and daily remittance are the same shape as the paper this audience originates every day. The limit of the comparison is the borrower base: Wayflyer's model is built on platform-connected e-commerce sellers with machine-readable revenue, and it does not map cleanly onto the service businesses, contractors, and brick-and-mortar operators that fill much of the MCA market.6
How does this fit Wayflyer's funding history?
As a step-change in structure, not just size. Wayflyer's stack to date has been debt facilities it draws and purchase arrangements it feeds: J.P. Morgan and Castlelake facilities in its early years, a $1 billion off-balance-sheet purchase arrangement with Neuberger Berman in September 2023, and a $250 million credit facility with Apollo-backed ATLAS SP Partners announced February 18 of this year to expand its SME funding capacity.5 4 The corporate history behind those facilities deserves one honest sentence: the $1.6 billion valuation dates to a February 2022 equity round, there has been no priced equity round publicly reported since, and the company does not publish loss rates or profitability, so the health of the book itself is not externally verifiable. A three-year committed purchase program from a buyer that has now repeated the same trade across SoFi and Upstart is the strongest third-party underwriting signal the company has received, and it is also, notably, a signal from a buyer that saw the loan-level data the rest of us cannot.8
Why are credit funds buying fintech originations right now?
Because money arrived faster than deals did. PitchBook's PC Monitor put second-quarter US direct-lending volume at $33.59 billion, down roughly 55% from the first quarter and the lowest since Q2 2023, while North American closed-end direct-lending funds raised $16.25 billion in the same quarter, the strongest fundraising in two years.10 11 Dry powder stacking against a shrinking corporate deal set pushes managers toward asset-based finance, where deployment is programmatic instead of episodic: a forward flow deploys capital every week for three years without winning a single sponsor auction. The SMB side of that migration is now unmistakable. Forward Financing closed $525 million on July 17 across an oversubscribed rated ABS and an expandable facility syndicated to insurers and private credit funds, making it the third MCA funder to print a rated ABS this year, a milestone we covered on July 18, and trade coverage read it as the asset class graduating into institutional portfolios.12 13 Securitization and forward flow are the two doors into the same room, and institutions are now walking through both.
What does this mean for MCA and revenue-based funders?
Three operational reads. First, the forward-flow template is now proven for this asset class with a named mega-buyer, which means funders with clean books have a second exit besides securitization, one with no rating-agency gate and no 144A minimum size. It also changes warehouse math: for a funder growing on marked warehouse leverage, a committed purchase program converts advance-rate and repricing exposure into a known take-out for three years, which is exactly the trade Wayflyer just made. Second, the qualifying test has moved. Fortress is not buying a brand; it is buying a data pipeline. Wayflyer's underwriting runs on machine-readable merchant revenue, and any funder hoping to attract a comparable bid should assume the buyer's diligence starts with loan-level performance tapes, servicing reporting, and remittance data quality, not with origination volume.6 Third, the competitive effect lands on merchant acquisition: a Wayflyer funded by committed institutional purchases can price and scale against every funder courting the same online sellers, and the undisclosed economics cut in its favor, because none of its competitors can benchmark the cost of capital they are now up against.1
Our Opinion
The industry spent a decade arguing that revenue-based paper is an institutional asset class, and the argument is now over: after committing billions to consumer platforms like SoFi and Upstart, the next asset Fortress agreed to buy at scale is merchant advances. But notice what carried the deal. It was not the product, which is the same fixed-fee, daily-remittance instrument this industry has originated for twenty years. It was the data custody around the product: platform-verified revenue, machine-readable remittance, a book a buyer can re-underwrite line by line from its own systems. Institutions did not learn to love MCA economics; they learned to trust a version of the asset they can audit continuously. That is the actual moat being priced here, and it is buildable by any funder willing to treat its data infrastructure as a funding asset rather than a reporting chore.
The honest caveat belongs in the same breath: every economic term of this deal is private. When capital is available on terms nobody will print, the working assumption should be that the terms price real risk, not that they flatter the seller. A three-year commitment struck in a quarter when deployment fell 55% is as much a statement about buyers needing assets as sellers earning trust. The funders who benefit from this precedent will be the ones who show up with tapes that survive diligence in a quarter when the dry powder has somewhere else to go.
1-Minute Video: Why EIN Verification Should Be Step One in Your Lending Waterfall
Bad EINs are the cheapest fraud to catch and the most expensive to miss.
Fabricated and mismatched EINs are one of the most common ways bad applications slip into a lending pipeline. Verifying the EIN against Secretary of State records takes seconds and filters them out before underwriting ever starts.
This one-minute walkthrough shows why EIN verification belongs at the very top of the lending waterfall, before a single dollar goes out.
or
Free Tools for Lending Teams
Headlines You Don’t Want to Miss
PitchBook reports that Hayfin now runs software borrowers through a GenAI underwriting framework that scores workflow embedding, core-service substitution risk, proprietary data ownership, and exposure to AI disruption, and says its portfolio has minimal exposure to the software credits most susceptible.15 The capital behind the framework is fresh: the firm's fifth flagship direct lending fund closed above EUR 15 billion in early July, a record and more than double the prior vintage, with over half already committed and deployment expected to reach about 65% after a busy July pipeline.14 Recurring-revenue lending was built on the premise that software cash flows are the safest collateral in credit; the largest dedicated European direct lender now formally underwrites the possibility that AI erodes them. Any funder holding SaaS-adjacent exposure should ask its credit team the same four questions Hayfin is asking.
Darragh Buckley, Stripe's first employee and founder of banking-infrastructure company Increase, completed his takeover of Twin City Bank of Longview, Washington and relaunched it July 29 as Increase Bank, an FDIC-member institution with Federal Reserve approval behind the change of control.16 The pitch pairs Increase's API core, which the company says supports more than $500 billion in annualized processing for customers including Gusto and Ramp, with direct ownership of the charter, removing the banking-as-a-service middleware layer whose ledger failures stranded fintech end-user funds in the Synapse collapse. "This is the bank for ambitious technology companies," Buckley wrote at launch.18 17 For lending programs that have lived through partner-bank de-risking cycles, a charter-owning infrastructure provider is a new counterparty class worth pricing. The open question is whether Increase Bank takes credit programs or stays a payments and deposits shop.
Connecticut Banking Commissioner Jorge L. Perez issued a consent order July 20 against Miami-based revenue-based financer Giggle Finance, which the order alleges entered 418 commercial financing agreements with Connecticut businesses between October 1, 2024 and April 6, 2026 without the registration required under the state's commercial financing law.20 The math is the story: the statute authorizes penalties up to $100,000 per violation, and 418 alleged agreements times that maximum works out to a theoretical exposure above $41 million, yet the matter settled for a $10,000 civil penalty plus $2,000 in back registration fees, without Giggle admitting or denying the allegations. Giggle represented that it had built the state's disclosure requirements into its agreements before the law took effect, learned from the Department on February 23 that its registration was never completed, applied two days later, and cooperated fully.19 The signal for every funder operating in disclosure states: regulators are now checking registration rolls against transaction records, and cooperative posture, not statutory maximums, priced this outcome.
Sources
1 Bloomberg | Fortress to Purchase $1.5 Billion of Loans By Fintech Unicorn Wayflyer
2 Crypto Briefing | Fortress Investment Group to Purchase $2B in Loans from Wayflyer
3 Wayflyer | Wayflyer Secures $250M Credit Facility with ATLAS SP Partners to Expand SME Funding Capacity
4 FinTech Futures | Irish Unicorn Wayflyer Lands New $250M Credit Facility Agreement
5 TechCrunch | E-commerce Loan Startup Wayflyer Secures $1B Deal from Neuberger Berman
6 Finder | Wayflyer Review: Revenue-Based Financing Up to $20M
7 United Capital Source | Wayflyer Review: Pros, Cons, and How to Apply
8 Upstart Investor Relations | Upstart Announces $1.25B Forward-Flow Agreement with Fortress Investment Group
9 Investing.com | Upstart Secures $1.25 Billion Loan Purchase Deal with Fortress
10 PitchBook | Amid Market Shift, US Direct Lending Activity Nears Three-Year Low
11 Private Equity Wire | US Private Credit Fundraising Rebounds Despite Sharp Fall in Direct Lending Activity
12 Fintech Global | Forward Financing Lands $525M to Boost SME Lending
13 Funder Intel | Forward Financing's $525 Million Raise Signals the Asset Class Has Grown Up
14 Hayfin | Hayfin Announces Record Close of Direct Lending Fund V in Excess of EUR 15bn
15 PitchBook | AI Disrupts Software Underwriting for Europe's Lenders as Hayfin Deploys EUR 15B Fund
16 Bloomberg | Increase Founder Buys Washington Bank to Expand Fintech Services
17 PYMNTS | Increase Debuts Bank to Help FinTechs Build Financial Products
18 The Bank Slate | Increase Bank Officially Launches After Darragh Buckley Buys Small Bank
19 Hartford Business Journal | Miami Fintech Penalized After Financing 418 CT Businesses Without Registering
20 Connecticut Department of Banking | In the Matter of Giggle Finance Inc., Consent Order, July 20, 2026
21 SoFi Investor Relations | SoFi Secures $3.2 Billion Expansion to Loan Platform Business Across Agreements with Fortress and Edge Focus

