• Beyond Banks
  • Posts
  • J.S. Held Survey: SMB Hiring Intentions Collapse to 10%

J.S. Held Survey: SMB Hiring Intentions Collapse to 10%

Stressed Borrowers, Not Growth Seekers, Are Coming in Q1 2026

The J.S. Held/Phoenix Management Q4 2025 "Lending Climate in America" survey reveals a sharp reversal in lender sentiment following three consecutive Fed rate cuts.¹ After optimism surged in Q3, confidence has eroded significantly heading into 2026—with economic outlook grades dropping 20 basis points near-term and 25 basis points long-term.¹ For alternative lenders, the signal is clear: traditional banks are retreating just as borrowers need capital most.

  • Economic confidence falling: Near-term GPA dropped from 2.58 to 2.38 (Q3 to Q4); long-term expectations fell from 2.71 to 2.46—"D" level expectations rose from 8% to 13%¹

  • Tightening on the horizon: 21% of lenders plan to tighten loan structures vs. just 5% planning to relax—a 4:1 tightening ratio¹

  • Small-balance stability: Loans under $5M showed essentially no structural change (31% tighten vs. 32% prior quarter)¹

  • Hiring freeze signal: Customer hiring intentions collapsed from 21% to 10%—businesses are preserving cash, not expanding¹

  • Sector volatility alerts: 43% expect retail trade volatility; 38% flag healthcare; finance & insurance surged from 10.5% to 25.4%¹

  • Capital demand rising: 64% of lenders expect customers to raise additional capital in the next six to twelve months¹

Bottom line: When 21% of traditional lenders tighten while 64% of borrowers seek capital, deal flow shifts to alternative funders—but so does fraud risk. The hiring freeze (21% → 10%) signals this is working capital demand from stressed borrowers, not growth capital from healthy ones. Price accordingly.

Sources
1 Phoenix Management | Lending Climate in America Q4 2025 Full Report (PDF)Primary source; survey tabulated October 31, 2025
2 PR Newswire | J.S. Held Releases the Lending Climate in America Survey Results
3 J.S. Held | Lending Climate in America – 3rd Quarter 2025 Survey
4 Federal Reserve | FOMC Statement December 10, 2025
5 Federal Reserve | January 2025 Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey (SLOOS)
6 CNBC | Fed Interest Rate Decision December 2025
7 Hilco Global | Navigating the 2025 Bankruptcy Cycle: Strategic Insight for Asset-Based Lenders
8 Retail Dive | Retailers That Could File for Bankruptcy in 2025
9 S&P Global | Healthcare Tops Q1 2025 Sector Risk Analysis
10 Kaufman Hall | 2025 Healthcare Credit and Capital Markets Outlook
11 Prospect Capital Management | Healthcare Private Credit 2025 Market Outlook
12 ABF Journal | Middle Market Credit Shifts: Dividend Recaps Rise Amid Tech-Led Transformation
13 Mordor Intelligence | Factoring Market Size, Trends & Research Report 2025-2030
14 SFNet | ABL Q2 and Factoring Mid-Year Reports
15 Haversine Funding | Adapting to 2024: 3 Key Trends in Factoring and Asset-Based Lending
16 Skilled Nursing News | Nursing Home Loan Delinquency Rates Rise in 2024, Hit 2.7%
17 LendingTree | 1 in 5 Loan, LOC or MCA Applicants Denied in 2024
18 Onyx IQ | Fraud Prevention and MCA: An Overview for Funders
19 Biz2Credit | Avoid the Debt Trap: Risks of Stacking MCA Financing
20 NY Attorney General | Settlement with Yellowstone Capital regarding MCAs

What Alternative Business Lenders Need to Know

Where Are Structures Actually Tightening—And What Does That Mean for Pricing?

The loan structure data reveals a bifurcated market. For loans above $25M, tightening intentions actually decreased from 24% to 15%, with 85% now maintaining current structures.¹ The $15-25M tranche shows similar stability, with tightening dropping from 26% to 13%.¹

The $5-15M segment is the battleground: tightening intentions rose from 21% to 23%, while relaxation jumped from 3% to 8%.¹ Some lenders are getting aggressive to maintain volume while others pull back. If you compete in this space, know who's relaxing and why—they may be chasing risk you should avoid.

For loans under $5M, structures remained essentially unchanged: 31% plan to tighten (vs. 32% in Q3), 59% maintain (vs. 58%), and 10% relax (vs. 11%).¹ Banks aren't abandoning small-balance commercial; they're frozen in place.

What this means for pricing: The competitive environment hasn't materially changed at the sub-$5M level. Factor rates in MCA remain in the 1.1–1.5 range, with typical deals landing at 1.2–1.4 for A-paper and 1.35–1.5 for C-paper.²¹ Factoring discount rates run 1–5%, with advance rates of 80–95%.²¹ Traditional factoring fees exceed bank lending rates by 200–400 basis points.¹³

In the middle market, private credit spreads have compressed to approximately 525 basis points over SOFR at the median, but lower middle market deals (EBITDA below $25M) maintain pricing power with spreads often exceeding 500 bps.¹² The spread compression is happening at larger deal sizes—not in the sub-$5M space where most alternative lenders operate.

Why the Hiring Freeze Is the Most Actionable Signal

64% of surveyed lenders expect their customers to raise additional capital in the next six to twelve months—up from 58% in Q3.¹ But customer hiring intentions collapsed from 21% to just 10%.¹

When businesses are raising capital while freezing headcount, they're in cash preservation mode—not growth mode. That's working capital demand, not term loan demand. MCA, A/R factoring, and short-duration products should see elevated flow, but the borrower profile is shifting from growth-oriented operators to stressed operators seeking liquidity.

This is the setup that produces stacking. When traditional lenders tighten and borrowers get desperate, they start layering MCAs on top of each other. MCA stacking creates overlapping repayment schedules—each funder takes its cut daily, which can drain cash flow to the point where the business can't operate.¹⁹ MCA default rates already run 20–30%,¹⁸ and that number climbs when borrowers are stacking.

Risk adjustment: Tighten your position verification. Check for existing UCC filings before funding. If a merchant already has two or three positions, the economics of adding another are terrible for everyone involved.

Fraud Risk Rises When Traditional Credit Tightens

The Yellowstone Capital settlement should be a warning sign. New York's Attorney General secured a $1B+ judgment against Yellowstone for what were essentially loans disguised as MCAs—with fixed payments, no reconciliation, and effective APRs that exceeded 100%.²⁰ The settlement canceled over $534 million in outstanding balances and barred Yellowstone from the MCA business entirely.²⁰

When traditional lenders retreat, borrowers get creative. Fake bank statements are available online for as little as $10, and fraudsters use them to present healthier deposit balances and transaction flows than reality.¹⁸ Shell corporations with zero assets and fictitious documents have extracted millions from MCA funders.¹⁸

Underwriting adjustments:

  • Use bank verification APIs (Decision Logic, Plaid, etc.) rather than accepting uploaded statements

  • Cross-reference business registration dates against stated time in business

  • Check for multiple UCC filings from other funders

  • Verify that the business address matches the bank account address

  • Flag applications where the "merchant" can't explain basic operational details about their business

The 21% tightening vs. 64% seeking capital dynamic creates exactly the desperation environment where fraud attempts spike. Build verification costs into your pricing now rather than eating losses later.

Healthcare: Connect Sector Risk to Underwriting Adjustments

Healthcare volatility expectations jumped from 26% to 38%—a 12-point increase in one quarter.¹ The survey notes the government shutdown's focus on healthcare costs and funding is driving concern.¹ S&P Global data shows healthcare had the highest median probability of default among all U.S. public sectors in Q1 2025—6.90%, up from 5.71% in Q4 2024.

But the 6.9% number masks significant subsector variation. Here's how to adjust:

Skilled nursing facilities: Nursing home loan delinquency rates rose to 2.7% in 2024—up from 0.6% in late 2023.¹⁶ That's a 4.5x increase in one year. Medicaid reimbursement timing (90% of clean claims within 30 days, 99% within 90 days) creates structural cash flow gaps, but the bigger risk is Medicaid rate adequacy. If you're factoring skilled nursing receivables, drop your advance rates to 70–75% on Medicaid-heavy payer mixes (vs. 85–90% on Medicare/commercial). Increase your reserve holdback by 5–10 percentage points.

Behavioral health and outpatient services: Durable demand and 1.6% cumulative default rates since 2000.¹¹ Multi-visit authorization requirements create payment delays, but the underlying reimbursement is more stable than long-term care. You can maintain standard medical factoring advance rates (80–90%) with commercial/Medicare payer mixes.²¹ Mental health billing codes require specialized verification—if you're not already set up for behavioral health, the learning curve isn't worth the risk at current volumes.²²

Home health and hospice: Mixed bag. Commercial-pay home health is fundable at standard advance rates. Hospice with heavy Medicaid exposure carries the same reimbursement risk as skilled nursing—reduce advance rates accordingly.

Retail: The Bankruptcy Wave Is Already Priced In

43% expect retail volatility—down from 55% in Q3.¹ That's still the top volatility sector, but the decline suggests the worst may be behind us. Moody's distressed list includes Guitar Center, At Home, and several home goods retailers, but many at-risk names have already filed.

The headwinds are structural: home goods retailers face weak housing turnover, discretionary spending is constrained among lower-income consumers, and the 2025–2028 debt maturity wall is already producing Chapter 11s.

Underwriting adjustment: If you're funding retail, your advance rates and holdback percentages should already reflect distress pricing. The question isn't whether to avoid retail—it's whether you have the workout expertise to capture the spread. If 43% of your competitors expect retail distress, advance rates will compress market-wide. The lenders who maintain sector expertise while tightening underwriting will capture share from generalists who exit.

Finance & Insurance: The Canary in the Coal Mine

This is the signal that deserves more attention. Finance & Insurance volatility expectations jumped from 10.5% to 25.4%—a 15-point surge in one quarter.¹ Lenders are seeing stress in their own ecosystem.

The likely drivers: regional bank exposure to commercial real estate, insurance carrier reserve concerns, and the knock-on effects of CRE distress on financial services portfolios. If you have exposure to premium finance companies, equipment lessors, or smaller balance sheet lenders, tighten your monitoring. These are the borrowers most likely to face liquidity squeezes if the credit cycle turns.

Construction: The Re-Entry Window

Construction volatility expectations dropped from 29% to 10%—the biggest decline in the survey.¹ Rate-cut optimism is flowing into the sector. If you've been underweight construction, this may be the re-entry point.

The Fed has cut rates three times, bringing the target to 3.50%–3.75%. The December dot plot signals slower easing than expected (one additional cut in 2026, one in 2027), but construction borrowers have already benefited from 75 bps of relief. That's meaningful for project economics, especially in residential where rate sensitivity is highest.

Our Opinion

The data points to a specific opportunity: working capital products for stressed borrowers, not growth capital for expanding businesses. The hiring freeze (21% → 10%) tells you who's coming through your door in Q1 2026—businesses preserving cash, not businesses hiring.

Three adjustments to make now:

1. Increase verification spend. When 64% of borrowers need capital and traditional lenders are tightening, fraud attempts increase. Bank verification APIs, UCC lien searches, and business registration checks aren't optional—they're the difference between capturing the spread and eating the loss. Build the cost into your pricing.

2. Segment healthcare exposure by payer mix, not sector label. The 38% volatility expectation for healthcare is misleading. Skilled nursing with Medicaid-heavy payer mixes saw delinquency rates spike 4.5x in one year (0.6% → 2.7%).¹⁶ Behavioral health with commercial/Medicare payer mixes runs 1.6% cumulative defaults over two decades.¹¹ Same "healthcare" label, completely different risk profile. Adjust advance rates accordingly: 70–75% on Medicaid SNF, 85–90% on commercial behavioral health.

3. Watch the Finance & Insurance spike. A 15-point jump in volatility expectations for financial services in one quarter means lenders see stress in their own ecosystem.¹ If you're funding premium finance companies, equipment lessors, or smaller lenders, your counterparty risk just increased. Tighten position limits and increase monitoring frequency.

The sub-$5M market where most alternative lenders operate remains competitive but stable.¹ Banks aren't retreating—they're frozen. Your edge remains speed and flexibility, but your risk management needs to adjust for a borrower pool that's increasingly desperate rather than opportunistic. Price for cash preservation demand, not growth demand. Verify harder. And don't assume that elevated deal flow equals elevated quality.

1-Minute Video: Beyond Entity Status: The Multi-Step UBO Identification Workflow

Beneficial ownership verification is a high-friction compliance requirement that's ripe for automation.

The value proposition isn't eliminating document collection—it's creating an independent verification layer that catches discrepancies before they become funding mistakes or examination findings.

For alternative lenders operating at scale, the question isn't whether to automate UBO verification.

It's whether you can defend your current process to an examiner who asks: "How do you know the beneficial owners disclosed are the actual beneficial owners?"

Automated SOS officer extraction doesn't answer that question completely—but it demonstrates you're asking it systematically.

Subscribe to our Beyond Banks Podcast Channels

Headlines You Don’t Want to Miss

Connecticut’s Department of Banking fined two Florida-based finance companies a combined $20,000 for making small loans and engaging in sales finance activity in the state without required licenses. Under a consent order, Great American Finance Holdings LLC and Castle Credit Co. Holdings LLC must also reimburse affected Connecticut borrowers for interest above the state’s 12% cap, pay back licensing fees, halt unlicensed activity, and promptly provide records to regulators going forward.​

Octane, a New York-based fintech that finances recreational and specialty vehicles, has raised $100 million in a Series F equity round to accelerate growth of its digital vehicle-financing platform. The round, led by Valar Ventures with participation from Upper90, Huntington Bank, Camping World and others, will fund product innovation, market expansion, and enhancements to Octane’s end-to-end dealer and consumer financing experience.​

eLEND Solutions has introduced a new fintech platform designed to streamline auto dealership finance and credit workflows, aiming to connect sales and F&I in a more seamless, real-time process. The vendor‑neutral, API-based system focuses on delivering lender-matched, fundable payment options at the point of sale to reduce friction, shorten transaction times, and improve profitability for dealers.

Get Free Access to our Cobalt Modern Underwriter GPT

Get Free Access to our Alternative Funding Expert GPT

Get Free Access to our AI Credit Risk Tool

Create an account to Get Free Access to our Secretary of State AI Tool

Subscribe on our YouTube Channel here

See us on LinkedIn