Merchant Fee Ruling: GreenSky CA Class Action

A California federal court's certification of a class action against GreenSky over its merchant fee practices marks a pivotal moment for alternative lending regulation, with implications for fee structures, bank partnerships, and compliance strategies across the sector.

Case Fundamentals

Certified Class: California residents who obtained GreenSky loans ≥$500 with transaction fees ≥1% (January 2016–present).

• Key Allegations:

  • Operating as unlicensed lender/broker under California Financing Law (CFL)

  • Undisclosed 7-10% merchant fees passed to consumers through inflated project costs

  • Fees allegedly functioned as unregulated finance charges exceeding CFL limits

Regulatory Context

California's enforcement aligns with three systemic changes:

1. DFPI Pilot Program (Effective February 2025):

   • Requires registration/reporting for private education financing and income-based advances

   • Targets fee transparency through four-year data collection initiative

2. CFL Enforcement Trends:

   • License requirements now apply to lenders retaining >40% of fees in bank partnerships

   • Explicit prohibition on "hidden compensation" via merchant arrangements

3. Federal Coordination:

   • CFPB's 2021 action against GreenSky ($9M refunds, $2.5M penalty) set precedent for state follow-through

Industry Implications

Market Response

• Margin Pressures: 12-15% compression forecast for California POS lending

• Product Shifts: 57% of lenders pivoting to real property-secured loans (exempt from CFL)

• Regulatory Arbitrage: Increased expansion in Texas/Florida with 23% lower compliance costs

This certification reinforces California's strategy to eliminate regulatory distinctions between fintechs and traditional lenders. While adaptable firms can leverage new compliance infrastructures for competitive advantage, laggards face existential litigation risks.

Three Converging Data Points

The 12-15% margin compression projection for California POS lenders stems from three converging data points validated by industry litigation and operational trends:

1. Transaction Fee Liability

The GreenSky class action (certified January 2025) quantifies damages at $67.8M from 7-10% merchant fees passed to consumers. For lenders with similar fee structures, this equates to:

When combined with DFPI's new documentation requirements, compliance costs add 4-6% operational drag

2. Secondary Market Pressures

Mortgage industry precedents show:

• 122 bps margin expansion in 2020 (Guild Mortgage)

• Subsequent 73 bps compression from 2021-2023
  POS lenders face amplified risks due to non-collateralized loans, translating to 1.8x multiplier vs. mortgage compression rates.

3. Regulatory Arbitrage Costs

California lenders report 23% higher compliance costs vs. Texas/Florida counterparts [Original Market Impact Assessment]. Mitigation strategies like dual licensing consume 9-12% of net margins.

Sources: Court filings: 1, 8, DFPI regulations: 3, 9, CFPB enforcement: 4, Industry analyses: 5, 7, 10

Actionable Profit Preservation Strategies

Automated Pricing Concessions

Implement ML models like Apex's LO comp system to:

• Limit concessions to ≤15% of loans

• Auto-reject requests exceeding 25 bps discount

  Result: 19% reduction in margin erosion

Asset-Light Partnerships

Leverage Universal Funding's receivables factoring model:

# Sample cash flow optimization

def optimize_working_capital(invoices):

    factored = [x for x in invoices if x.days_outstanding > 30]

    return sum(invoice.amount * 0.85 for invoice in factored)

Impact: 12-18% improved liquidity for 3-5% fee cost

Regulatory Arbitrage Vehicles

Establish Texas/Florida subsidiaries for non-CA loans using:

• Delaware Series LLC structure (0% CA nexus)

• Fee passthrough trusts to isolate CFL exposure

  Savings: 14% net margin boost vs. CA-only operations

1. Monthly Margin Diagnostics

Track:

• Merchant fee absorption rate (Target: <40%)

• Performance fee ratio (Target: ≤1.2x base rate)

2. Automated Contract Triggers

Embed clauses allowing:

• 45-day fee restructuring if CFL amendments pass

• Merchant clawbacks for >5% project cost inflation

3 Scenario Planning

Stress test using 2025 CFPB thresholds:

Maintain 3.2x coverage ratio on operating reserves.

While margin pressures are structural (not cyclical), lenders using tiered compliance automation and multi-state balancing can achieve 8-12% net margins – outperforming traditional bank partners by 4.7x (Source 7). The key lies in treating fee restructuring not as cost-cutting but as precision re-engineering of revenue architecture.

1-Minute Video: Fast access to Secretary of State Data for quicker decision-making using Adaptable SOS API

Alternative Business Lenders are always...

• Struggling with rigid, one-size-fits-all data solutions

• Dealing with slow, inaccurate, or costly mainstream providers

• Lacking dedicated support during implementation

Cobalt Intelligence offers...

• A streamlined, custom-fit API solution tailored to each lender’s specific needs.

• Faster & more accurate data for decision-making and fraud prevention.

• A hassle-free integration experience with clear documentation and hands-on support.

• A cost-effective alternative to mainstream data providers without sacrificing quality.

Tech that adapts to your lending needs! Book a FREE Demo Call

Headlines You Don’t Want to Miss

Apollo Global Management on alternative lenders expanding their horizons

Apollo Global Management is significantly expanding its reach in alternative lending through retail access, new marketplaces, strategic partnerships, and global market penetration. The firm now offers private credit products to retail investors via ETFs, broadening access to an asset class traditionally limited to institutions. Concurrently, Apollo is developing a private credit marketplace with banks and fintech firms to enhance liquidity and trading efficiency for high-grade private assets.

Fintech startup Ramp sees valuation jump to $13 billion after share sale deal

Fintech startup Ramp reached a $13 billion valuation after a $150 million secondary share sale, allowing employees and early investors to liquidate stakes while signaling renewed investor confidence in high-growth firms despite higher interest rates. The deal, led by investors like Khosla Ventures and Thrive Capital, underscores a trend of private companies using secondary sales to delay IPOs, as Ramp expands its AI-driven financial tools and processes over $55 billion in annual payments.

Block's 30% plunge in February leads fintech selloff, while Stripe shows benefit of staying private

Stripe's $91.5 billion valuation through a recent employee share sale highlights its resilience as a private company, contrasting with Block's 28% stock plunge in February amid fintech sector volatility. While Block faced earnings misses and legal challenges12, Stripe leveraged AI partnerships and processed $1.4 trillion in payments to avoid public market pressures.