• Beyond Banks
  • Posts
  • Midland States and M2 Equipment Finance Abandon Equipment Lending

Midland States and M2 Equipment Finance Abandon Equipment Lending

$905K unsecured claim from M&T Bank on Dolche Truckload

Why Did Midland States and M2 Equipment Finance Abandon Equipment Lending Simultaneously?

Midland States Bancorp ceased all equipment finance production effective September 30, 2025, after recording $5 million in net charge-offs from its trucking portfolio in Q3 alone³.

The Illinois-based bank increased loss-given-default assumptions across its $4.87 billion loan portfolio, with CEO Jeffrey Ludwig stating the equipment finance division would "not achieve our expected returns over the long term". Total provisions for credit losses reached $20.5 million in Q3, with $15 million attributed solely to equipment finance exposure.

M2 Equipment Finance, a Wisconsin-based subsidiary of QCR Holdings, discontinued new loan and lease originations in September 2024, citing "market dynamics" and a need to "allocate capital to assets with higher risk-adjusted returns".

The company's allowance for credit losses climbed to 3.9% in Q2 2024 from 3.5% the prior year, while maintaining a $360 million servicing portfolio expected to amortize over three years.

Both exits occurred within months of each other, suggesting synchronized recognition of systemic credit deterioration rather than institution-specific underwriting failures.

The timing coincides with trucking bankruptcy filings reaching their highest monthly concentration since systematic tracking began, with 12 additional freight carriers filing Chapter 11 in October 2025 alone.

Which Lenders Are Capitulating in Transportation Finance and What Does Their Exit Tell Us About Portfolio Risk?

Regional banks and equipment finance subsidiaries are executing rapid exits from trucking portfolios, with two major lenders halting all new originations in Q3 2025 after absorbing multimillion-dollar charge-offs concentrated in sub-100 fleet bankruptcies. The withdrawal pattern reveals specific risk triggers alternative lenders can exploit or avoid, including:

  • collateral depreciation rates exceeding 20% annually

  • unsecured exposure from deficiency balances

  • adverse selection dynamics where carriers seek financing immediately before operational failure¹².

What Loss Severity Are Banks Actually Experiencing on Secured Trucking Loans?

Court filings reveal substantial unsecured deficiency balances where collateral liquidation fails to cover outstanding principal. M&T Bank reported $905,000 in unsecured claims from Dolche Truckload's bankruptcy, secured against nine Freightliner trucks and one Volvo truck, plus an additional $45,000 tied to nine Wabash reefer trailers. The same institution holds over $400,000 in unsecured claims from Daniel Trucking International's filing, representing exposure across 47 trucks¹⁰.

BMO Bank faces approximately $900,000 in unsecured claims from Propel Trucking's October 2025 filing, concentrated in six truck transactions¹¹. The Canadian parent company, Bank of Montreal, is actively exploring sale of its entire transportation finance arm following elevated impaired loan formations¹². BMO's gross impaired transportation loans reached CAD $503 million in Q2 2025 before declining to CAD $424 million in Q3¹³.

These deficiency balances indicate collateral coverage ratios below 50% in multiple transactions, contradicting traditional equipment finance assumptions where 75-80% LTV provides adequate protection. The gap stems from accelerated depreciation in used truck values, which declined 15-20% year-over-year through mid-2024 according to ACT Research data¹⁴¹⁵.

How Does Collateral Depreciation Compare to Historical Equipment Finance Norms?

Used Class 8 truck average retail prices fell to $55,745 in September 2025, representing a 27.4% decline from pandemic-era peaks and continuing monthly depreciation exceeding 2% on unsold inventory¹⁶¹⁷. November 2024 marked the first month since April 2021 that average transaction prices dropped below $60,000¹⁸.

Repossession inventory surged 25.8% year-over-year in May 2024, with Sandhills Global reporting "a lot of voluntaries right now in that space to where they just can't make it work"¹⁹. Liquidation timelines extended beyond normal 30-60 day wholesale cycles as dealer networks became saturated with defaulted carrier assets.

The depreciation velocity creates margin compression for lenders who originated loans at 2022-2023 valuations. A $150,000 truck financed at 80% LTV in early 2023 now carries liquidation value below $100,000, leaving $20,000+ deficiency balances after repossession costs. These losses compound when carriers default within 12-18 months of origination, before significant principal amortization occurs.

Which Carrier Bankruptcies Signal Broader Market Deterioration Versus Isolated Failures?

Combined with earlier 2025 filings and filings below, the sector reported at least 17 Chapter 11 cases in Q2 alone²¹.

  1. G1 Transport filed Oct. 3 in the Northern District of Georgia;

  2. GEC Transport Solutions filed Oct. 6 in the Southern District of Texas;

  3. Hadnot Logistics filed Oct. 29 in the Northern District of Texas;

  4. IH 35 Transportation filed Oct. 2 in the Southern District of Texas;

  5. Mister M&K Trucking filed Oct. 17 in the Western District of Texas;

  6. Propel Trucking filed Oct. 2 in the Eastern District of Arkansas;

  7. R&R Transport & Logistics filed Oct. 9 in the Southern District of Texas;

  8. Ricky Sellers Trucking filed Oct. 23 in the Southern District of Alabama;

  9. Styx Logistics filed Oct. 9 in the District of Nevada;

  10. Supra National Express filed Oct. 28 in the Northern District of Illinois;

  11. Titan Group Logistics filed Oct. 30 in the Central District of California; and

  12. VIB Trans filed Oct. 28 in the Northern District of Illinois;

This spike follows an already elevated trend and overall bankruptcies in the sector are outpacing those in 2024.

Montgomery Transport's October 2025 Chapter 7 liquidation represents the largest single trucking bankruptcy of 2025, affecting approximately 1,000 employees and ceasing operations immediately without wind-down period²². The Birmingham-based flatbed carrier's abrupt closure left in-transit freight stranded and creditors with minimal recovery prospects.

The pattern reveals systematic margin compression rather than management incompetence. Failed carriers include 58-truck Daniel Trucking International, 70-truck Elite Carriers, and 70-truck Dolche Truckload, demonstrating that mid-sized operators with established fleets cannot survive prolonged spot rate suppression²³²⁴.

What Freight Rate Environment Drove These Carrier Failures?

Dry van spot rates averaged $1.63 per mile (excluding fuel) in September 2025, up only 2.5% year-over-year despite capacity reductions²⁵. These rates remain below average carrier operating costs, which the American Transportation Research Institute calculates at approximately 34% higher than 2014 levels when similar spot rates last prevailed²⁶.

Spot rates persisted "well below public truckload carriers' operating cost per mile for most of the past year," according to freight market analysis, creating unsustainable unit economics for smaller operators without contractual volume guarantees²⁷. The spot-to-contract spread compressed to $0.34 per mile by September 2025, eliminating traditional arbitrage opportunities that allowed spot market specialists to remain profitable²⁸.

Carriers seeking equipment financing in this environment face dual pressure: insufficient cash flow to service existing debt while also unable to generate returns justifying new equipment purchases. This creates the adverse selection dynamic where only the most distressed operators pursue alternative financing, precisely when their default risk peaks.

How Should Alternative Lenders Reposition Given Bank Withdrawals?

The regional bank retreat creates temporary pricing power for alternative lenders willing to accept transportation exposure, but sustainable profitability requires operational monitoring capabilities banks lacked. Midland States' exit demonstrates that traditional financial statement analysis and collateral-based underwriting cannot identify deterioration fast enough in 90-120 day credit cycles.

Competitive positioning opportunities include:

Geographic concentration in non-bank markets: Midland States operated primarily in Illinois and the Midwest, while M2 served Wisconsin-centric markets²⁹³⁰. Alternative lenders can capture dealership relationships these institutions abandoned.

Subordinated working capital structures: Banks' unsecured deficiency exposure suggests opportunity for junior capital providers who price for 40-50% loss severity rather than assuming collateral recovery.

Debt service monitoring technology: Real-time cash flow tracking and CSA score monitoring provide 30-60 day advance warning that quarterly financial statements miss, as demonstrated by Midland's $5 million single-quarter charge-off³¹.

Rush Enterprises noted in October 2025 earnings that "financing remains a challenge for many buyers" with an "increasing number of bankruptcies of small carriers," confirming dealer networks face origination gaps banks formerly filled³².

The strategic calculus depends on whether alternative lenders view banking exits as validation of systemic risk or as overcorrection creating opportunity. Current spot rates suggest the freight recession continues through at least mid-2026, with ACT Research forecasting continued capacity oversupply and muted demand³³.

Our Opinion

Midland States and M2 Equipment Finance exits signal that traditional secured lending models cannot withstand 20%+ annual collateral depreciation combined with spot rates below operating costs.

Banks absorbed deficiency losses exceeding $400,000 per carrier in multiple cases, demonstrating collateral coverage assumptions require fundamental revision.

Alternative lenders entering this space must price for 40-50% loss-given-default and implement real-time operational monitoring, as 90-day financial statement cycles provide insufficient early warning.

The competitive opportunity exists primarily in subordinated structures and technology-enabled underwriting that banks cannot replicate, not in traditional secured equipment finance at bank pricing.

1-Minute Video: What Actually Predicts Loan Performance? Good Owner-Operators

The best borrowers? They deeply understand their business, their cash flow, and exactly what they're using funds for. They have real conversations during underwriting, not scripted answers.

But here's the problem: How do you verify owner-operator legitimacy at scale before the conversation even starts?

Cobalt Intelligence's officer verification data lets you cross-reference the person applying against the actual legal owners on SOS records BEFORE you invest underwriting time.

Is the applicant listed as an officer?

How long have they been with the company?

Does the ownership structure match their story?

Filter for real owner-operators automatically, then have meaningful conversations with borrowers who've already cleared legitimacy checks.

Available for officer and ownership verification across 28 states with real-time SOS connectivity.

Want to focus your underwriting team on quality conversations with legitimate owner-operators?

Subscribe to our Beyond Banks Podcast Channels

Headlines You Don’t Want to Miss

Ansley Park Capital completed its first asset-backed securities transaction, raising $453.4 million by selling bonds backed by equipment loans and leases, with the deal closing on November 26, 2025.​ This diversified securitization is supported by contracts for essential-use equipment, including printing, manufacturing, and trucking assets, and features robust credit enhancements and solid performance history with no losses to date.​

Module Five Capital, a New York-based real estate lender, has secured a $30 million revolving credit facility from OakNorth to support the expansion of its short-term bridge and construction lending across major U.S. metro markets.​ The facility will fund new originations, especially multifamily, bridge, and fix-and-flip loans, enabling Module Five Capital to further scale its platform and lending capacity in markets including New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.​

Quantum Lending Solutions closed a $400 million financing round led by ATLAS SP Partners and LL Funds, providing the company with fresh debt and equity to scale its AI-powered lending platform for banks and technology platforms.​ This new capital will accelerate Quantum's ability to offer advanced, responsible, and scalable credit solutions to small and medium-sized businesses, leveraging technology rebuilt for the AI era and following recent surges in partner growth and origination volume.​

Get Free Access to our Cobalt Modern Underwriter GPT

Get Free Access to our Alternative Funding Expert GPT

Get Free Access to our AI Credit Risk Tool

Create an account to Get Free Access to our Secretary of State AI Tool

Subscribe on our YouTube Channel here

See us on LinkedIn