- Beyond Banks
- Posts
- New Laws Could Limit Fintech-Bank ties in CO & VA
New Laws Could Limit Fintech-Bank ties in CO & VA
$800M FinTech Lending At Risk

Recent legislative actions in Colorado and Virginia are reshaping the fintech lending landscape, with significant implications for interest rate regulations and consumer credit access.
Colorado's DIDMCA Opt-Out Law
FDIC Withdraws Support: The FDIC reversed its 2024 stance by withdrawing an amicus brief that supported Colorado's law (HB23-1229), which attempts to opt out of federal interest rate "exportation" rules under the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act (DIDMCA).
Legal Battle: A federal judge previously blocked the law in June 2024, siding with fintech and banking groups arguing it violates constitutional protections for interstate commerce. The case now awaits a Tenth Circuit ruling.
Core Dispute: Colorado claims loans are "made" where borrowers reside, subjecting lenders to its 15% rate cap. Opponents argue loans are "made" where banks operate, invoking federal preemption rights.
Impact: A win for Colorado could empower other states to restrict fintech-bank partnerships, while a loss would preserve existing interstate lending frameworks.
Virginia’s SB 1252 Interest Rate Cap
Broad Restrictions: The pending bill expands Virginia’s 12% interest rate cap to cover fintech-bank partnerships, targeting "rent-a-bank" arrangements. It explicitly includes online lending and earned wage access programs.
Industry Backlash: Critics warn the bill’s vague language could stifle credit access for 235,000 Virginians (~$800M annually) and expose third-party vendors to liability. The American Fintech Council calls it a de facto ban on responsible lending.
Earned Wage Access: The bill treats cash advances repaid via payroll deductions as loans, subjecting them to the 12% cap. Providers argue this misclassifies their products and disrupts financial flexibility for hourly workers.
Status: Awaiting Governor Glenn Youngkin’s signature or veto, with a July 2025 effective date if enacted.
Broader Implications
Regulatory Uncertainty: Both states’ efforts reflect a national trend to close perceived loopholes in usury laws, creating compliance challenges for fintechs and banks.
Consumer Access: Stricter caps may exclude subprime borrowers from credit markets, as lenders deem 12% rates unsustainable for high-risk loans.
Federal-State Tension: The FDIC’s reversal highlights shifting priorities under new leadership, favoring bank-fintech partnerships over state restrictions.
These developments underscore the ongoing clash between state consumer protection goals and the fintech industry’s push for interstate lending flexibility.
Economic Impact on Credit Availability
Reduced Competition: Colorado’s 15% rate cap and Virginia’s proposed 12% cap risk stifling competition by pushing state-chartered banks and fintechs out of subprime markets. Traditional banks historically avoid high-risk borrowers, leaving fintech partnerships as a critical bridge—a role now jeopardized by stricter usury laws.
Subprime Exclusion: Virginia’s SB 1252 could exclude ~235,000 subprime borrowers from accessing $800M in annual credit, as lenders deem low rates unsustainable for high-risk profiles. This aligns with studies showing interest rate caps reduce small-dollar loan volumes by 19–36%.
Market Contraction: Post-Colorado’s 36% payday loan cap, fintechs filled the gap, but new restrictions threaten to reverse this. Similar laws in Iowa and Puerto Rico led to credit deserts, forcing reliance on pawnshops or overdraft fees.
Small Business Perspectives
Fintech Reliance: Fintechs like Funding Circle and LendingClub disproportionately serve ZIP codes with higher unemployment (+5–10%) and bankruptcy rates, providing credit to businesses often rejected by traditional lenders.
Automated Underwriting: Fintechs’ use of alternative data (e.g., cash flow analytics) improves default prediction accuracy by 15–20% compared to FICO scores, enabling lending to firms with "thin" credit histories.
Impact of Disappearing Channels: If Colorado/Virginia laws disrupt bank-fintech partnerships, 30–40% of small businesses in underserved areas could lose access to growth capital, per Federal Reserve surveys.
Federal-State Regulatory Conflict
DIDMCA Preemption Battles: Colorado’s HB23-1229 challenges the federal "exportation" doctrine, which lets banks apply their home state’s interest rates nationally. The FDIC’s withdrawn amicus brief signals shifting federal priorities under new leadership favoring fintech partnerships.
Regulatory Fragmentation: Virginia’s SB 1252 highlights a patchwork of state laws conflicting with the OCC’s "valid-when-made" rule, creating compliance headaches for cross-border lenders.
Dual Banking System Erosion: Colorado’s opt-out risks pushing state-chartered banks to reincorporate nationally, undermining the DIDMCA’s original goal of preserving a competitive dual system.
Recent legislative tensions in Colorado and Virginia underscore the need to explore how alternative lenders innovate beyond traditional risk models while balancing regulatory concerns. Below is an expanded analysis incorporating cash flow underwriting, small business growth strategies, and compromise frameworks:
Innovations in Risk Assessment Beyond FICO
1. Cash Flow Underwriting & Open Banking
Dynamic Financial Analysis: Alternative lenders use real-time bank transaction data to assess income volatility, discretionary spending ratios, and liquidity buffers. Platforms like Plaid enable analysis of 12-month cash flow trends (e.g., identifying seasonal businesses via revenue fluctuations) with 30% higher predictive accuracy than FICO alone.
Custom Metrics:
Industry
Metric
Impact
Restaurants
Daily sales variance
Trucking
Fuel cost/revenue ratio
E-commerce
Chargeback frequency
Behavioral Signals: Some lenders analyze digital footprints (e.g., accounting software login frequency) as proxies for financial discipline, reducing defaults by 12–18% in pilot programs.
2. Alternative Data Fusion Models
Rental Payment Scoring: Incorporation of 24+ months of on-time rent payments expands credit access to 14 million "credit invisibles".
Supply Chain Ecosystems: Fintechs like BlueVine underwrite invoices using buyer creditworthiness (e.g., Walmart suppliers approved at 2.5x higher rates than traditional lenders).
Machine Learning Synergy: Blend FICO with 150+ alternative variables (e.g., education/career path stability) achieves 92% AUC in default prediction—14 points above baseline models.
Small Business Growth Applications
A. Expansion Financing
Inventory Scaling: 63% of retailers use merchant cash advances to stock high-demand items pre-holidays, achieving 28% higher holiday revenues than peers.
Tech Adoption: 40% of manufacturers access equipment loans under 48-hour approval to implement AI quality-control systems, reducing defects by 19%.
B. Market Diversification
Cross-Border Trade: Platforms like Kabbage provide revolving credit lines tied to Amazon/Etsy sales data, enabling 34% of microbusinesses to export internationally.
C. Talent Acquisition
Revenue-Based Payroll Loans: Restaurants use daily sales-linked loans to hire seasonal staff, increasing summer capacity by 45% without equity dilution.
Successful Models Across States
Framework | Key Features | Outcome |
---|---|---|
Utah’s Sandbox (2024) | 18-month testing period for AI underwriting with CFPB oversight | |
Illinois Tiered Licensing | Caps ($1M/loan) and rate ceilings (18%) for lenders using alternative data | |
Nevada’s Co-Regulation | ILPA-certified lenders exempt from state usury laws if they: | 87% borrower satisfaction vs 54% in non-participating states |
Alternative lenders are redefining creditworthiness through hyper-contextual risk models that empower small businesses to pursue growth rather than mere survival. Legislative solutions like tiered caps and sandboxes offer viable paths for states to protect consumers without stifling innovation—critical as 38% of small businesses now rely on non-bank financing for strategic initiatives. The key lies in adaptive frameworks that reward responsible underwriting while maintaining market fluidity.
Our Opinion
This regulatory trend represents an existential threat to alternative lending industry. These state-level actions fundamentally misunderstand how alternative lending works.
At a 12-15% rate cap, it becomes mathematically impossible to serve higher-risk borrowers who desperately need capital. These aren't predatory loans - they're risk-based pricing that allows entrepreneurs and small businesses to access funding when traditional banks say "no."
The claim that partnerships between fintechs and banks are "rent-a-bank" arrangements completely mischaracterizes legitimate business models that have expanded credit access to underserved markets. The real losers here will be consumers and small businesses in these states.
Virginia's extension to earned wage access (EWA) programs is particularly troubling - these aren't loans, they're innovative financial tools that provide flexibility to workers. Classifying them as loans under usury laws demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of financial innovation.
The FDIC's position shift signals political interference rather than sound policy, creating additional uncertainty in an already complex regulatory landscape.
1-Minute Video: Secretary of State Data Integration with Plaid or MoneyThumb
The difference between a bad loan and a great loan?
Real-time data.
One effective combination is integrating the Secretary of State API with bank data platforms like Plaid or MoneyThumb.
These platforms provide real-time information on cash flow, transaction history, and other crucial financial data essential for making informed underwriting decisions, particularly for large institutional loans.
It's time to take the wheel with real-time insights. Book a FREE Demo Call
Headlines You Don’t Want to Miss
JPMorgan Chase is significantly expanding its direct lending efforts by allocating an additional $50 billion from its balance sheet, supported by nearly $15 billion from co-lending partners, to capitalize on the rapidly growing private credit market. This move builds on the bank's deployment of over $10 billion across more than 100 private credit deals since 2021, positioning it as a major competitor in a sector projected to reach $3 trillion by 2028
Lender groups, including the National Association of Government Guaranteed Lenders, are urging the Small Business Administration to reverse Biden-era fee waivers on loans under $1 million and tighten underwriting standards, citing rising early defaults and negative cash flow in the 7(a) loan program. Their proposals, supported by Sen. Joni Ernst and some banking advocates, include reinstating equity injection requirements and loan authorization memos to address deteriorating loan performance linked to 2023 policy changes
The North Carolina House Judiciary 1 Committee approved the "Farmers Protection Act" (HB 62), which prohibits banks and credit unions from denying services to agricultural producers based on ESG criteria like greenhouse gas emissions or fossil-fuel use, shifting the burden to lenders to prove any service denials are strictly financial rather than ESG-related. Critics argue the bill prioritizes fossil fuel interests over climate adaptation, warning it could harm agriculture by blocking sustainable practices needed to address climate change impacts.
Schedule a FREE Demo Call with Jordan
Get Free Access to our Alternative Finance Disclosure Law Helper GPT
Get Free Access to our Cobalt Modern Underwriter GPT
Get Free Access to our Alternative Funding Expert GPT
Get Free Access to our AI Credit Risk Tool
Create an account to Get Free Access to our Secretary of State AI Tool
![]() | Subscribe on our YouTube Channel here |
See us on LinkedIn |