March 1 policy change bars all non-U.S. citizens from 7(a) and 504 programs, forcing thousands of creditworthy businesses into alternative lending market

Starting March 1, 2026, SBA completely excludes lawful permanent residents and all non-U.S. citizens from its 7(a) and 504 loan programs, requiring 100% U.S. citizen/national ownership¹. In fiscal 2024, SBA approved $31.5 billion across 70,200 7(a) loans²—capital now inaccessible to businesses with even 1% non-citizen ownership. For alternative lenders, this creates a quantifiable displaced borrower pool: creditworthy businesses with revenue history, suddenly cut off from the most favorable financing in the U.S. market.

_{Sources
1 U.S. Small Business Administration | Update to SOP 50 10 8 – Citizenship and Residency Requirements
2 Boxwood Means | SBA 7(a) Loan Volume Accelerated in 2024 with Key Policy Changes
3 NerdWallet | Green Card Holders No Longer Eligible for SBA Loans
4 The Business Journal | SBA bars green card holders from business loan ownership starting March 1
5 North American Community Hub | Impact of Immigrant-Owned Businesses on Local Economies in 2025
6 Senator Patty Murray | Murray, Markey, Senate Democrats Request Answers from SBA on New Citizenship Requirements
7 Inc. | Green Card Holders Shut Out of Key Small Business Loan Programs
8 Bankrate | What is the SBA Weekly Lending Report and How Does It Work?
9 Gusto | Immigrants Started Nearly 1 in 5 New Businesses in 2023
10 Verified Market Research | United States Merchant Cash Advance Market Size And Forecast
11 Eagle Business Credit | The Difference Between an MCA Loan and Invoice Factoring
12 altLINE | Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) Industry Statistics
13 American Immigration Council | Nearly Half of Fortune 500 Companies in 2025 Were Founded by Immigrants}

This policy creates a quantifiable displaced borrower pool—businesses with creditworthy fundamentals, established revenue streams, and demonstrated ability to service debt, but newly ineligible for SBA-backed financing. These are exactly the prospects alternative lenders are built to serve. Here's what matters for your deal pipeline.

The numbers tell a clear story. Immigrant entrepreneurs start 28% of new U.S. businesses despite being 15% of the population⁵⁹. In 2024, 17% of new business owners were born outside the U.S., and 91% of immigrant-owned businesses had at least one employee compared to 84% overall⁹. Immigrant entrepreneurs employ 1 in 10 private-sector workers—roughly 15 million Americans⁵.

SBA 7(a) volume hit $31.5 billion across 70,200 loans in fiscal 2024². In markets with high immigrant concentration like California's Central Valley, lenders report that 10% of their SBA loans involved LPR ownership⁴. Apply that 10% nationally and you're looking at 7,000+ transactions worth $3+ billion annually—now ineligible. And that understates the problem. The June 2025 citizenship verification rollout triggered a 46% drop in small business lending from June to August⁶, suggesting the March 1 total exclusion will hit even harder.

These aren't marginal borrowers. The average 7(a) loan in 2024 was $448,400; 504 loans averaged $1.1 million⁸. These businesses passed SBA underwriting before the citizenship rule changed—they have revenue, debt service coverage, and collateral. They're just owned by the wrong people now.

The 7(a) program offers terms alternative lenders can't match: up to $5 million, 10-25 year terms, fixed rates currently in the 11-13% range (Prime + 2.75% to 4.75%), 85-90% SBA guarantees that let banks lend at lower spreads. Borrowers used SBA financing for working capital, equipment, real estate acquisition, and business purchases with minimal equity injection.

Now they're stuck. Traditional banks won't replicate SBA terms without the guarantee. That pushes borrowers toward your market: revenue-based financing, equipment leasing, factoring, ABL facilities, and MCAs. The U.S. MCA market was valued at $19.65 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $32.7 billion by 2032¹⁰. Global invoice factoring hit $3.09 trillion in 2024 and is growing at 11.9% CAGR¹¹.

Borrowers won't like paying factor rates of 1.2-1.5x (translating to APRs well into triple digits) instead of SBA's sub-15% fixed rates¹². They won't like 3-24 month terms instead of 10-year amortizations. But they need capital, and you're now their best option.

Accommodation and food services took 17.2% of 7(a) loans and 22.1% of 504 loans in 2024—the highest share of any sector⁸. Retail trade, healthcare, and personal services also saw significant SBA activity. These are exactly the industries where immigrant entrepreneurs are overrepresented. Franchise ownership—hotels, quick-service restaurants, convenience stores, transportation—is heavily immigrant-driven.

Geographically, California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Illinois are home to the largest immigrant entrepreneur populations¹³. California alone had 30 Fortune 500 companies founded by immigrants¹³. At the Main Street level, regions with high foreign-born populations—South Texas, South Florida, the Bay Area, Metro New York—will see the most acute SBA displacement.

The real competitive question isn't which SBA lenders are losing business—it's whether they're building workarounds. Are banks launching non-SBA commercial products to retain these customers? Are they setting up referral partnerships with alternative lenders? Or are they just walking away from a segment they spent years cultivating?

Early signals suggest most banks are walking. SBA-focused lenders like Live Oak, Huntington, and newer players like Lendistry built specialized immigrant business programs because the SBA guarantee made the economics work. Without that guarantee, their cost of capital and risk tolerance don't support equivalent terms. They're not going to offer 10-year fixed-rate loans at 12% to businesses they previously underwrote with 85% government backing.

That creates a referral opportunity. Banks hate telling creditworthy borrowers no. If you can structure a partnership where displaced applicants get referred to you—ideally with a fee split or reciprocal arrangement—you'll capture dealflow before borrowers start shopping around. Focus on regional and community banks with high immigrant customer concentrations. They're more likely to value the relationship preservation than large national SBA lenders.

Watch for competitive moves from fintech lenders and embedded finance platforms. They can move faster than traditional alternative lenders because they're already digitally native. If companies like Stripe Capital, Square, or industry-specific platforms (Toast for restaurants, Shopify Capital for retail) launch targeted immigrant business products, they'll have distribution advantages you can't match. The key indicator: if you start seeing targeted Spanish or Mandarin digital ads from fintech competitors in CA/TX/FL markets, the race is on.

If you're suddenly processing 3x-10x more applications from immigrant-owned businesses, your fraud detection needs to scale proportionally. This segment faces unique fraud risks: synthetic identities using valid ITINs with fabricated business histories, documentation mills producing fake tax returns and bank statements, application brokers coaching borrowers to inflate revenue, and legitimate businesses desperate enough to accept 'help' that crosses into misrepresentation.

Red flags to watch:

Verification strategy: Layer your checks. Start with automated business verification APIs to confirm entity legitimacy, operating status, and principal identity. Cross-reference stated revenue against card processing data if you have access. For deals above $100K, verify tax transcripts directly with IRS (Form 4506-C) rather than accepting uploaded PDFs. On deals above $250K, consider third-party site visits or requiring borrower video calls to confirm actual business operations.

The cost-benefit matters. Fraud losses on a $50K MCA at 1.3x factor rate cost you $65K. Spending $500-1,000 on enhanced verification for questionable deals is cheap insurance. Budget 2-3% of loan volume for fraud prevention tools and accept that some legitimate deals will fall out due to increased scrutiny.

Every alternative lender reading the same news just identified the same opportunity. Customer acquisition speed determines who captures the market. Here's what works:

Direct outreach channels:

Digital acquisition:

Referral partnerships:

Acquisition cost benchmarks: Expect to pay $2K-4K per funded deal in customer acquisition costs for this segment (higher than your typical $800-1,500 CAC because you're competing harder). Track cohort performance by acquisition channel—if ethnic chamber referrals default at 8% but Google Ads leads default at 14%, double down on chambers even though cost per lead is higher.

Timing matters. The window between now and March 1 is critical. Businesses that get SBA loan numbers before the deadline are safe; everyone else is yours. Launch outreach now targeting businesses currently in SBA pipeline ('If your application hasn't closed, here's your backup plan'). The urgency drives faster decisions.

First, reputational exposure. You'll be lending to businesses that SBA just declared ineligible for taxpayer-backed financing. If you market aggressively to displaced immigrant borrowers, expect scrutiny. Community groups are already calling the policy discriminatory. Being seen as profiteering from a controversial immigration policy could draw unwanted attention from regulators, advocacy groups, or media.

Second, underwriting complexity. These borrowers were previously SBA-eligible, which means banks vetted them with the benefit of an 85-90% government guarantee. You're underwriting at 100% risk exposure. Some of these businesses are fundamentally sound; others only penciled with SBA's generous terms. You need to differentiate. Look for businesses with strong unit economics, diversified revenue streams, and debt service coverage above 1.5x even at your higher rates.

Third, policy reversal risk. Immigration policy is politically volatile. A future administration could reverse this rule, reopening SBA access to green card holders. If that happens, your borrowers will refinance back to SBA programs the moment they're eligible. Build that into your hold period assumptions and fee structures. You're providing bridge capital, not 10-year term debt.

public access to Tax Identification Numbers through the Secretary of State.

That's a fraud detection advantage you can't get in California or New York.

But Florida also uses cryptic status codes that confuse underwriters.

"Inactive/MG" means merged, the entity is dead. "Inactive/CV" means converted, also dead. Both warrant automatic decline because you're funding a legal fiction.

"Inactive" by itself is trickier. Could be a late annual report, could be chronic compliance failure. Needs manual review.

Full blog:

Florida Business Entity Verification: What Alternative Lenders Need to Know

Great American Holdings (GA Group), based in Westlake Village, California, announced two strategic moves: acquiring Risk Solutions International and launching Great American Capital Corporation (GACC), a new asset-based lending platform. Led by President and Chief Investment Officer Eran Cohen, GACC will offer financing from $20 million to $100 million to middle-market companies. Cohen, with over 30 years of experience, will oversee strategy, originations, and portfolio management, leveraging GA Group's 50 years of asset valuation expertise.

U.S. commercial real estate deal volume dropped 20% year-over-year in December 2025, the second consecutive monthly decline, with transactions 30% below 2019 levels. Despite a 17% increase in full-year 2025 deal volume over 2024, growth slowed from the previous year's 24% due to high interest rates, policy uncertainty, and a looming loan maturity wall. Recovery was uneven: deals over $100 million rose 23% from 2024 but were half of 2019 levels, while sub-$5 million deals exceeded pre-pandemic levels by 4%, driven by private capital. The December slowdown was due to a pricing standoff between buyers and sellers, not a clear downturn.

The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) opened a New York City office to boost private-sector recruitment and deal flow after its financing capacity increased from $60 billion to $205 billion through the DFC Modernization and Reauthorization Act of 2025. CEO Ben Black, confirmed by the Senate in October 2025, said the Wall Street presence allows DFC to "operate at the pace of the private sector" by expanding global investment access and bridging the gap between Washington policymaking and Wall Street execution.