- Beyond Banks
- Posts
- UMB Bank: First Brands Abandons $55M in Assets
UMB Bank: First Brands Abandons $55M in Assets
SPE lenders say $55M collateral being pooled improperly

UMB Bank Demands Independent Trustee as First Brands Advisers "Abandon" $55 Million in Assets
UMB Bank filed an emergency motion on November 23, requesting Judge Christopher Lopez to appoint an independent trustee to manage special purpose entities that secured financing backed by Ultinon inventory. The bank argues First Brands management has "an unavoidable conflict of interest" and is prioritizing certain lenders while attempting to divert portions of the $1.1 billion rescue financing to a cash-strapped German affiliate.
The motion claims First Brands advisers "are abandoning" more than $55 million worth of property belonging to the SPEs, escalating creditor disputes beyond the $700 million fraud allegations against founder Patrick James.
Judge Denies Asset Freeze Despite Fraud Evidence
Judge Lopez denied First Brands' November 13 bid to freeze Patrick James's personal assets, despite finding substantial likelihood of success on fraud claims. The company's November 3 lawsuit alleges James orchestrated "staggering dissipation of assets," deploying two strategies: causing First Brands to incur at least $2.3 billion in factoring liabilities based on non-existent or doctored invoices, and using SPVs to incur another $2.3 billion in debt through double-pledging collateral.
Multiple creditor groups are challenging the company's advisory structure, with lenders owed over $200 million arguing that the same legal team cannot represent both First Brands and the SPV debtors due to inevitable asset disputes.
DIP Financing and Investigation Budget Approved
First Brands secured court approval on November 6 for $600 million in additional rescue financing, bringing total debtor-in-possession financing to $1.1 billion. Judge Lopez ordered an independent examination of fraud allegations on November 19, allocating a $7 million budget for the investigation.
The bankruptcy filing on September 28 initially reported $1 billion to $10 billion in assets against $10 billion to $50 billion in liabilities. The collapse accelerated when investors demanded a quality of earnings report during a failed July refinancing attempt, causing first-lien term loans to plummet from near par to $0.36 in three weeks.
Background:
First Brands filed Chapter 11 on September 28, disclosing $2 billion in factoring arrangements and up to $4 billion in off-balance sheet liabilities. The company sued founder Patrick James on November 3, alleging multibillion-dollar fraud involving fake invoices and double-pledged collateral. Raistone, the firm that arranged much of First Brands' financing, is now seeking a rescue or sale after losing its largest client.
SOURCES:
Transport Topics | First Brands Sees New Call for Outside Trustee to Manage SPEs
Bloomberg Law | First Brands Loses Bid To Extend Ex-CEO Asset Freeze
Transport Topics | First Brands Founder Wins Control of Personal Bank Accounts
Crain's Cleveland Business | First Brands founder regains control of personal bank accounts
The BRAKE Report | First Brands Gains Approval for $1.1B DIP Financing
Transport Topics | First Brands Wins Access to Last $600M of Emergency Funds
Reuters | Court Orders Independent Probe Into First Brands Fraud Allegations
Bloomberg Law | First Brands Judge Approves Examiner to Probe Fraud Allegations
Transport Topics | First Brands Sues Founder Over $700M in 'Pilfered' Funds
Global Trade Review | First Brands accuses founder of receivables and inventory finance fraud
Crain's Cleveland Business | First Brands sues founder Patrick James for allegedly pilfering funds
Kroll Restructuring Administration | First Brands Group, LLC - Case Information
What This Means for Alternative Lenders
The conflict between UMB Bank and First Brands advisers over SPE property rights signals that creditor recoveries will be determined through extended litigation, not orderly restructuring. When advisers are accused of abandoning $55 million in collateral while simultaneously requesting $1.1 billion in DIP financing, recovery timelines extend from months to years.
The denial of the asset freeze motion creates immediate operational consequences. Patrick James retains control of personal assets despite allegations he siphoned $700 million, meaning fraudulent transfers cannot be clawed back until the independent examiner completes investigation. With a $7 million budget allocated for forensic accounting, the examination phase alone will consume six to nine months before any recovery actions begin.
For factoring and ABL lenders, the SPE disputes expose how inventory and receivables can be simultaneously pledged across multiple facilities through entity structuring. UMB's claim that certain collateral belongs exclusively to SPEs, while First Brands seeks to pool those assets for broader creditor benefit, previews the priority fights that will determine whether factors recover 10 percent or 50 percent of principal.
The attempted diversion of DIP proceeds to German affiliates demonstrates how international structures complicate domestic bankruptcy cases. Alternative lenders financing U.S. entities with foreign parent companies or subsidiaries must now treat cross-border fund flows as red flags requiring explicit covenant restrictions, not assumptions of good faith.
Our Opinion
The UMB motion exposes the operational reality behind SPE financing structures that alternative lenders treat as routine risk mitigation. When a bankruptcy court must decide whether $55 million in inventory belongs to special purpose entities or the broader estate, every lender using similar structures should immediately audit their own documentation. The allegation that advisers are "abandoning" SPE property while requesting court approval to divert DIP proceeds internationally demonstrates that entity separation provides zero protection when management has conflicting loyalties.
Alternative lenders relying on SPE structures for collateral isolation need three immediate actions. First, require explicit court-ordered recognition of SPE independence at the first sign of borrower distress, not after bankruptcy filing when advisers have already been appointed. Second, covenant language must prohibit any intercompany transfers or affiliate support without prior lender consent, eliminating the cross-border diversion risk UMB now faces. Third, administrative agent agreements should include automatic trustee appointment triggers when debtors sue their own founders for fraud, preventing the conflict-of-interest scenario currently playing out.
The practical lesson: SPE financing only works when courts enforce entity separation. UMB's fight for a neutral trustee shows that assumption fails precisely when lenders need it most. Recovery timelines on First Brands exposure just extended another six months minimum.
Podcast Video: Lender Matrix Logic: AI-Powered Deal Routing Insights with Advanced Funds
Technology can analyze data, but it can't replace the phone call that tells you if someone's a payer or a non-payer.
David Catton built Advance Funds Network into a 5.0-rated broker by combining cutting-edge AI with old-school relationship building.
His prescreening AI and lender matrix ensure conversion rates stay high - they haven't had a 'your metrics are off' conversation with lenders in eight years.
But here's what separates good brokers from great ones: Technology brings you all the data, but nothing beats sizing someone up on a phone call.
AI handles pre-underwriting, analyzes lead generation data, and routes deals to the perfect lender. Humans make the final judgment call on character and commitment.
The firms winning in 2025 aren't choosing between technology and human touch - they're strategically deploying both.
Subscribe to our Beyond Banks Podcast Channels
Headlines You Don’t Want to Miss
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is a business development company focused on first-lien senior secured loans that currently offers an 11–12% dividend yield, with the payout roughly covered by net investment income and supported by a largely first-lien portfolio. Recent analysis argues the shares trade modestly below or around estimated fair value (roughly low‑to‑mid‑$30s targets vs. a mid‑$20s price), implying the double‑digit yield may be underpricing the credit quality and earnings power, but investors still face risks from potential Fed rate cuts, credit normalization, and a high payout ratio.
Federal Reserve data show that U.S. banks have increased their credit commitments to securitization vehicles such as CLOs, ABS and other special purpose entities by about 30% in the year to end‑Q2 2025, taking outstanding commitments in this “securitization” category to over 500 billion dollars and outpacing growth in lending to all other types of financial entities. The surge is being driven largely by insurance companies’ demand for higher‑yielding structured products to back a wave of new annuity business, which is pushing more activity into both traditional securitizations and private‑credit deals that use securitization techniques.
Revolut has completed a secondary share sale that values the private fintech at about 75 billion dollars, up sharply from roughly 45 billion last year, reflecting rapid revenue growth, solid profitability and expanding global operations. The round drew investment from NVentures, the venture arm of Nvidia, alongside major institutional backers such as Coatue, Greenoaks, Dragoneer, Fidelity Management & Research Company, Andreessen Horowitz, Franklin Templeton and T. Rowe Price.
Schedule a FREE Demo Call with Jordan
Get Free Access to our Alternative Finance Disclosure Law Helper GPT
Get Free Access to our Cobalt Modern Underwriter GPT
Get Free Access to our Alternative Funding Expert GPT
Get Free Access to our AI Credit Risk Tool
Create an account to Get Free Access to our Secretary of State AI Tool
![]() | Subscribe on our YouTube Channel here |
See us on LinkedIn |

